30 2nd Wine Advisor Archives

Since I started writing about wine in the early 1980s, about the only fluid I can think of that has increased in price as much as wine is gasoline; and that, now that I think about it, is a fairly close race.

30 2nd Wine Advisor

In my early years writing a wine column for the late, lamented Louisville Times, a local merchant once told me that only the most remarkable wines would persuade most consumers to part with more than $ 6 for a bottle. Later in the decade, that “threshold of resistance” price rose to $ 8, then $ 10; by the end of the millennium people who had objected to $ 6 wine were now willingly paying $ 25 or $ 30 or more for the good stuff.

More significantly, perhaps, from a world in which a wealth of excellent wine could be had for $ 5 or less, the minimum point for pleasurable vino gradually went up to $ 7 or $ 8, then $ 10, and nowadays – even in the grip of an enduring recession – it’s hard to find really excellent wine under $ 10 or perhaps even $ 15.

I’ve always tried to push back against this tide. While I’m never willing to sacrifice quality for the sake of a buck or two, I’ve largely devoted this newsletter of 30 2nd Wine Advisor and its parent website, WineLoversPage.com, to the quest for what wine “geeks” like to call “QPR”: Quality-Price Ratio, that sweet spot where the lines of quality and value cross at what might be called a bargain or best buy.

It’s no coincidence that I launched this publication in 1993 as “The Wine Bargain Page,” a concept that endures even if I later changed it to “WineLovers Page” to reflect a broader reach that might take in wine at any level, but still focused on value and a special celebration for the elusive bargain bottle.

With this as background, you can imagine that I clicked right through when Eric Asimov’s New York Times wine column, “The Pour,” came out this week with the headline “Wine’s QPR “sweet spot” around $ 20?”

Asimov asked, “What’s the right price for a bottle of wine? Silly question, I know. All sorts of prices are right, depending on the quality of the wine, the scarcity, the demand and other economic, social and psychological imperatives. Strictly speaking, a wine can be a great value at $ 10 or $ 200, though for most of us, a steal at $ 200 is small consolation, like a $ 5 million apartment deemed an excellent deal because its price has dropped by half.”

So far I was right there with him. But then he caught me up short: “Beyond the realm of the theoretical, though, there are wine bull’s-eyes where high values intersect with low prices. On the low end, that sweet spot ranges from $ 15 to $ 25; practically speaking, let’s call it $ 20.”

That jerked me up short. I’m still laboring under the opinion that $ 10 is doable and $ 15 easy. But $ 20? That’s starting to sound like real money. I posted the question on our WineLovers Discussion Group and, somewhat to my surprise, found general agreement with Asimov.

Several wine forum participants pointed out that favorites they consider QPR values have gradually risen from $ 12 or so to $ 20 over the past decade, including such goodies as Baudry La Grange and J.P. Brun Beaujolais from France, Donnhoff’s QbA from Germany and Edmunds St. John’s entry-level wines from California.

Yes, you can still find palatable wine for less. But is “palatable” good enough? Asimov thinks not. “Not for me,” he wrote. “I want wine that excites me, that feels so good to drink that one sip urges on the next and the next after that. I want a wine that tells a story of a place and a people and a culture, that is not the predictable equivalent of a franchise restaurant but more like a little mom-and-pop’s, where you’re not always sure what you’ll find but you know it can have the capacity to inspire.

“You might be able to find a bottle like that for $ 10. But it’s rarer than you think. At $ 15 to $ 25, though, the odds swing decidedly in your favor. With a little experience, you can find dozens of joyous bottles, plucked carefully from the ranks of the routine.”

I couldn’t improve on Asimov’s advice for finding those elusive bargains: Avoid the pricey, sought-after styles, Napa Cabernet, Barolo or genuine Champagne; even quality Burgundy is largely off the list, he says, although I’m still an advocate of Bourgogne Pinot Noir from the more reliable shippers.

Rather, look for the regions off the beaten track – this is a drum I’ve been beating for years – looking to the less-sought-after wine regions and grape varieties, or those that shun formal appellation in favor of “vin de table” and its cousins.

Here’s Asimov’s list of “20 memorable bottles for $ 20.” “To read his full column, click here. (May require a New York Times print or digital subscription).

30 2nd Wine Advisor – 20 MEMORABLE BOTTLES FOR $ 20

Francois Pinon Vouvray Brut NV
Domaine de l’Octavin Arbois The Peteux NV
La Clarine Farm Sierra Foothills Rose 2011
Doennhoff Nahe Estate Riesling 2011
Nusserhof Vino Rosso Elda 2009
Edmunds St. John El Dorado County Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir 2009
Josep Foraster Conca De Barbera Trepat 2010
Burlotto Langhe Freisa 2010
Guy Bossard Domaine de L’Ecu Muscadet de Sevre-et-Maine Expression d’Orthogneiss 2010
Gilbert Picq et ses Fils Chablis 2010
La Rioja Alta Rioja Reserva Vina Alberdi Seleccion Especial 2005
Produttori del Barbaresco Langhe Nebbiolo 2010
Olivier Lemasson Vin de France Poivre et Sel 2011
Argyros Santorini Assyrtiko 2010
Domaine Vico Corsica 2010
Denis Jamain Domaine de Reuilly Les Pierres Plates 2009
Jean-Paul Brun Domaine des Terres Dorees Cote de Brouilly 2010
Gunderloch Rheinhessen Riesling Kabinett Jean-Baptiste 2010
Ameztoi Getariako Txakolina 2011
Tablas Creek Vineyard Paso Robles Patelin de Tablas Blanc 2010

Asimov has the advantage of working in New York City, with access to perhaps the world’s best selection of retail wine. If you’re in a wine desert, you might try using Wine-Searcher.com’s search engine to plug in a key word or two from each wine name to find vendors.

Wrapping things up, I sought out a $ 20 bottle of my own for this week’s featured wine, and came home with an excellent pick from Oregon, Van Duzer 2008 “Vintner’s Cuvée” Willamette Valley Pinot Noir ($ 20.99). Cutting to the chase, this appealing Pinot showed the kind of delicious, intriguing complexity that helps justify the difference between a $ 10 wine and a $ 20 wine. You’ll find my tasting notes below.

I’ll keep looking for the occasional exceptions. Meanwhile, I’d love to know what you think. Drop me an Email at [email protected] to let me know where you find the sweet spot between quality and price.

Tagged with →  
Share →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *